Key takeaways
- Facial names like "classic", "European" and "medical-grade" are menu language, not federal definitions.
- Exfoliating facials work at different depths: dermaplaning and microdermabrasion stay at the surface, and peels range from superficial to deep.
- A "TCA peel" without a percentage doesn't tell you the downtime: only low-strength TCA, 10–20%, is a superficial peel.
- Hydrafacial's results percentages are participant-reported company figures, not peer-reviewed label data.
- Microcurrent clearance covers facial stimulation, not lifting, and peels cannot significantly tighten sagging skin.
Classic and European facials: the base of the menu
The classic facial — "European facial" is one of the names it goes by — is the base treatment of the facial menu, and its name is menu language: we could not find any FDA or federal definition of the facial names on spa menus.
FDA says the term "cosmeceutical" has no meaning under the law — a product is a cosmetic, a drug, or both — and cosmetics are not FDA-approved and are not meant to affect body structure or function.
We could not find a federal definition of a "medical-grade facial" either.
What a "classic" facial includes is therefore whatever the individual spa puts into it.
One manufacturer's version of the base shape: Hydrafacial's provider page describes its base treatment as cleanse and exfoliate, peel, extract, hydrate.
Because the name settles nothing, ask a specific office what its classic facial includes before you book — our facial guide covers the full med spa facial step by step.
Who performs this type is the other thing the name does not tell you: in North Carolina, the statutory definition of "esthetics" explicitly includes giving facials — the last section of this page covers that rule, and its limits.
Deep-cleansing and acne facials
Deep-cleansing and acne facials are named for the concern they target rather than a single technique, so the useful question is what the menu's steps actually are.
Extraction is a step Hydrafacial lists in its base treatment, and acid-based exfoliation belongs to the peel facials covered below, where the published trial evidence for breakouts sits.
What the evidence says comes from dermatology rather than the facial menu.
AAD lists chemical peels among the treatments dermatologists use for some types of acne, and a 2018 BMJ Open review of 12 randomized trials (387 participants) found commonly used peels appear similarly effective and well tolerated for mild-to-moderate acne — with the evidence quality rated very low to moderate and no peel shown superior to another.
Two limits are worth holding onto.
AAD says microdermabrasion won't treat acne scars, though it can even out skin tone alongside other acne-scar treatments, while Cleveland Clinic counts mild scars among what both microdermabrasion and dermaplaning are used for — the sources disagree at the edges, so treat "mild" as the operative word.
AAD's scar guidance adds that effective treatment depends on the scar type: ice pick scars need different treatment than rolling scars.
If scars are the real concern, our acne facial guide covers that type in depth, and our acne scars guide covers the scars themselves.
Hydrating facials: HydraFacial and oxygen facials
HydraFacial is the hydrating facial our research documents in detail — it has its own HydraFacial guide, so this is the short version.
Hydrafacial describes its Platinum treatment as seven therapies in one: lymphatic drainage, microdermabrasion-style exfoliation, a gentle peel, extraction, targeted booster serums, LED light therapy and a hydration infusion.
The company's provider page reserves the booster serums and blue or red LED for the Deluxe and Platinum tiers, and lymphatic drainage for Platinum alone; the base treatment cleanses and exfoliates, peels, extracts and hydrates.
What each Hydrafacial tier adds
| Step | Base | Deluxe | Platinum |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cleanse and exfoliate, peel, extract, hydrate | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Targeted booster serums | No | Yes | Yes |
| Blue or red LED | No | Yes | Yes |
| Lymphatic drainage | No | No | Yes |
The company says the treatment works through patented disposable "HydroPeel" tips in different exfoliation levels — gentler tips for first-time, dry or sensitive skin, more aggressive ones for dull, thick or oily skin.
Treat that as the manufacturer describing its own service — the same caution applies to the pore and fine-line percentages on Hydrafacial's results page, which are participant-reported figures citing company data on file and a 2018 study, not peer-reviewed label data.
Two anchors help you read the menu.
Regulatorily, Hydrafacial's devices are listed with FDA under product code GFE ("Brush, Dermabrasion, Powered", 21 CFR 878.4820), a Class I device category exempt from 510(k) premarket notification — registered and listed, rather than reviewed and cleared for specific uses.
On price, the company's device page publishes suggested retail prices of $250 for a Deluxe treatment and $325 for a Platinum treatment, and notes that actual provider prices vary.
"Oxygen facial" is the other name in this slot, and our research came up empty there: we did not find independent evidence summaries for oxygen facials, nor an independent source on HydraFacial's side effects or how often to repeat it.
Ask any provider you consult what their version involves.
Find facial providers near you
Compare Google ratings, reviews and posted prices at med spas in your city.
Exfoliating facials: dermaplaning, microdermabrasion and peel facials
Three facial types share one job — removing the outermost skin — at different depths. Dermaplaning shaves away the uppermost layers of skin with a blade; Cleveland Clinic describes it as a minimally invasive procedure used for dull skin, fine lines, mild acne scars and peach fuzz, with any hair removal temporary because the hair grows back.
It usually isn't painful, and a session can run from a few minutes to 90 minutes depending on the area treated.
Cleveland Clinic lists the risks as infection, scarring and skin discoloration, and suggests talking to a provider first if you have active acne, cold sore outbreaks, eczema, psoriasis, moles or skin growths, or skin burns or rashes.
Dermaplaning may not reduce deep or raised acne scars, where more intensive treatments such as laser may be needed.
Microdermabrasion exfoliates the uppermost skin layer mechanically instead: tiny crystals sprayed through a tube and vacuumed back up, or a diamond-tipped wand that abrades and vacuums debris.
Cleveland Clinic says it needs no anesthetic, takes about 30 to 40 minutes, and can leave skin red, swollen or sensitive for up to 24 hours.
It can make age spots, enlarged pores and blackheads, fine lines, mild scars, uneven tone and sun damage less noticeable, with bruising, discoloration, dry skin and sun sensitivity as possible downsides; monthly treatments can help maintain results, but it does not stop skin aging.
Our microdermabrasion guide covers it in depth.
Peel facials put a chemical exfoliant where the blade and the wand would go, and depth decides everything.
Chemical peels are classified by wound depth: superficial peels reach the epidermis only, medium-depth peels the full epidermis and papillary dermis, and deep peels down to the mid-reticular dermis.
Typical superficial agents are alpha hydroxy acids such as glycolic acid at 30 to 50%, plus lactic and salicylic acid; the most common medium-depth peels are 70% glycolic acid and 35 to 50% TCA (trichloroacetic acid).
TCA strength sets the depth — only low-strength TCA, about 10 to 20%, is a superficial peel — so a menu that says "TCA peel" without a percentage is not telling you the downtime.
A light peel heals in 1 to 7 days, and AAD notes 3 to 5 peels every 2 to 5 weeks may be needed.
Deep peels are the boundary of the category: they use TCA above 50% or a Baker-Gordon phenol peel, and AAD says a deep peel is done under general anesthesia in a surgical setting.
Our chemical peel guide covers depths, recovery and cost in full.
Chemical peel depths
| Depth | How deep it reaches | Typical agents |
|---|---|---|
| Superficial | Epidermis only | Glycolic acid 30–50%, lactic and salicylic acid; low-strength TCA, 10–20% |
| Medium | Full epidermis and papillary dermis | 70% glycolic acid; 35–50% TCA |
| Deep | Down to the mid-reticular dermis | TCA above 50% or Baker-Gordon phenol; general anesthesia in a surgical setting |
On July 30, 2024, FDA warned consumers not to buy or use certain chemical peel products without professional supervision. FDA has not approved any chemical peel products, and it says high-concentration TCA, glycolic, salicylic and lactic acid peels sold online can cause severe burns, infection, color changes and disfiguring scars.
"Lifting" facials: microcurrent and LED
The "lifting" end of the menu runs on two device families.
Microcurrent facial devices are FDA-regulated as Class II "transcutaneous electrical stimulators for aesthetic purposes" (product code NFO, 21 CFR 882.5890), and the clearance wording is for "facial and neck stimulation" for over-the-counter cosmetic use — the NuFACE Trinity, for example, was cleared under that product code in October 2018 (K181008).
Stimulation is what the clearance covers, not a lifting result.
A 2026 review of at-home skin devices — LED, radiofrequency, microcurrent, low-energy laser and IPL — in Facial Plastic Surgery found a favorable safety profile but only modest efficacy, with results more gradual and less pronounced than professional treatments.
LED facials overlap with red-light therapy, which the American Academy of Dermatology says is offered by a few dermatologists for acne, wrinkles and hair loss.
AAD adds that in-office red light is more powerful than at-home devices, and that most at-home LED devices are considered safe for home use.
Our microcurrent facial guide and red light therapy guide cover both in depth.
Microcurrent
- FDA Class II, cleared for facial and neck stimulation
- The clearance covers stimulation, not a lifting result
- At-home devices: favorable safety, modest efficacy in a 2026 review
LED and red light
- Offered by a few dermatologists for acne, wrinkles and hair loss
- In-office red light is more powerful than at-home devices
- Most at-home LED devices are considered safe for home use
Which type of facial fits your skin concern?
Matched by concern, the menu sorts out like this:
- Dullness or rough texture. The surface exfoliators aim here: dermaplaning is used for dull skin, microdermabrasion can make uneven tone and enlarged pores less noticeable, and chemical peels are on AAD's list for dull complexion and rough skin.
- Dark spots and discoloration. AAD lists chemical peels for age spots, discoloration, freckles and melasma; Cleveland Clinic counts age spots among what microdermabrasion can make less noticeable.
- Fine lines. AAD lists peels for fine lines, especially under the eyes and around the mouth; dermaplaning is also used for fine lines, and AAD says a few dermatologists offer red-light therapy for wrinkles. Know the ceiling: ASPS says chemical peels cannot treat deep facial lines or wrinkles.
- Active acne or acne scars. Peels have trial evidence for mild-to-moderate acne, microdermabrasion is not an acne-scar treatment per AAD, and problems beneath the surface may need something deeper — Cleveland Clinic's depth ladder runs from microdermabrasion (top skin layer only) to chemical peels (deeper) to microneedling (deeper still, and a candidate for problems like acne scars).
- Sagging. The weakest fit for a facial: ASPS says peels cannot significantly tighten loose or sagging skin, and the microcurrent clearance covers stimulation rather than lifting. Skin tightening is its own category — see our skin tightening guide.
Who may perform the facial you book is a state-by-state question.
Our research verified one state's rule in detail: North Carolina's statutory definition of "esthetics" includes giving facials, and estheticians there may use devices such as microcurrent, microdermabrasion, dermaplaning, LED-type esthetic devices and microneedling with a device no deeper than 1 mm — but may not penetrate beyond the epidermis or call themselves "Medical" or "Master" estheticians.
We did not verify equivalent rules for other states, so check your own state board's scope rules.
Two questions finish the job.
Ask what the evidence is for an add-on you are pitched: AAD describes PRP — the "vampire facial" add-on — as having little evidence behind it, an unproven treatment with unanswered questions about sessions, spacing and dosing.
And ask what the price excludes: facials are priced per session, tiered menus move the total, and Hydrafacial's $250/$325 suggested retail figures are manufacturer numbers that actual provider prices may not match.
We did not find a national survey of facial prices at med spas; our facial cost guide explains how pricing works.
None of this page is medical advice.
Which facial, if any, suits your skin is a question for a licensed provider who has examined it — the types above are the vocabulary for that conversation.
Frequently asked questions
What is a European facial?
We could not find a regulatory definition — "European facial" is menu language for a spa's base facial, and the contents vary by provider.
As one example of the base shape, Hydrafacial's provider page describes its base treatment as cleanse and exfoliate, peel, extract and hydrate.
FDA says even "cosmeceutical" has no meaning under the law, which tells you how loose cosmetic naming is.
Ask a specific office what its European facial includes: the steps, the products, and who performs each part.
Is HydraFacial FDA-approved?
No. Hydrafacial's devices are listed with FDA under product code GFE — "Brush, Dermabrasion, Powered" — a Class I device category that is exempt from 510(k) premarket notification.
That means the devices are registered and listed, not approved and not cleared for specific reviewed uses.
It is one more reason to read the brand's published results carefully: the percentages on Hydrafacial's own results page are participant-reported figures citing company data on file and a 2018 study, not peer-reviewed label data.
Which type of facial is best for acne?
We cannot pick a treatment for your skin — that is a licensed provider's job after an examination — but the published evidence runs like this.
AAD lists chemical peels among the treatments dermatologists use for some types of acne, and a 2018 review of 12 randomized trials found commonly used peels appear similarly effective and well tolerated for mild-to-moderate acne, with evidence quality rated very low to moderate.
AAD says microdermabrasion won't treat acne scars, and the right scar treatment depends on the scar type.
Sources
Every number on this page comes from one of these sources and was checked against it.
- hydrafacial.com · hydrafacial.com
- hydrafacial.com · hydrafacial.com
- hydrafacial.com · hydrafacial.com
- hydrafacial.com · hydrafacial.com
- api.fda.gov · U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- 21 CFR 878.4820 -- Surgical instrument motors and accessories/attachments. · ecfr.gov
- "Cosmeceutical" Label on Cosmetics · U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- nccosmeticarts.com · nccosmeticarts.com
- Is red light therapy right for your skin? · American Academy of Dermatology
- Dermaplaning: What It Is, Benefits & Side Effects · Cleveland Clinic
- Is microdermabrasion right for you? · Cleveland Clinic
- Acne scars: Consultation and treatment · American Academy of Dermatology
- Is platelet-rich plasma the secret to younger-looking skin? · American Academy of Dermatology
- A Practical Approach to Chemical Peels: A Review of Fundamentals and Step-by-step Algorithmic Protocol for Treatment · National Library of Medicine
- Evidence and Considerations in the Application of Chemical Peels in Skin Disorders and Aesthetic Resurfacing · National Library of Medicine
- Chemical peels: FAQs · American Academy of Dermatology
- Chemical peels: Overview · American Academy of Dermatology
- Chemical Peel · American Society of Plastic Surgeons
- Chemical peels for acne vulgaris: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials · National Library of Medicine
- Do not use chemical peel skin products · U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- accessdata.fda.gov · U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- The Safety and Efficacy of At-Home Devices for Skin Care · Layne et al., Facial Plast Surg, 2026
Medical disclaimer. MedSpaStandard is for education only and is not medical advice. Talk to a licensed provider about your own health, and check any provider's license with your state board.