Key statistics
- A 2026 Bayesian network meta-analysis of 56 RCTs (1,488 patients) on moderate-to-severe atrophic acne scars concluded combination therapies generally beat single treatments; fractional CO2 laser plus subcision or PRP was most consistent, and microneedling plus PRP ranked among the best for significant-improvement rate (Ou et al., Aesthetic Plast Surg). [4]
- In a 2014 JAMA Dermatology randomized split-face trial (Alam et al.; 20 enrolled, 15 completed), three needling-roller sessions 2 weeks apart significantly improved acne scar scores at 6 months; participants rated a 41% mean improvement on the treated side, mean pain was 1.08 of 10, and no adverse events were reported (2010 data). [1]
- A 2026 meta-analysis (Agu-Jefferson et al., Cureus; 11 studies, 713 participants) found no significant difference between microneedling and chemical peels in achieving clinically significant (≥50%) acne-scar improvement (RR 0.97), though microneedling was more likely to give any improvement (RR 1.79). [2]
- A 2024 network meta-analysis of 24 randomized trials (1,546 participants) found microneedling combined with chemical peels gave the best acne-scar improvement and satisfaction, combinations beat microneedling alone, and side effects (redness, pain, hyperpigmentation) did not differ significantly between treatments (Li et al., Arch Dermatol Res). [3]
- Google reviews of med spas offering microneedling average 4.85 stars, across 4,714,457 reviews of 32,065 rated listings, according to MedSpaStandard directory data for October 2026.
- 94% of the Google reviews left for microneedling providers are 5-star, according to MedSpaStandard directory data for October 2026.
- 82% of microneedling providers with at least 5 reviews hold a 4.8-star rating or better, according to MedSpaStandard directory data for October 2026.
- 3.4% of the Google reviews left for microneedling providers give 1 or 2 stars, according to MedSpaStandard directory data for October 2026.
- 1.1% of microneedling providers with at least 5 reviews average under 4.0 stars, according to MedSpaStandard directory data for October 2026.
- Google lists results as a review theme for 14% of microneedling providers with review themes, according to MedSpaStandard directory data for October 2026.
- Google lists natural-looking results as a review theme for 8.0% of microneedling providers with review themes, according to MedSpaStandard directory data for October 2026.
What is the success rate of microneedling?
A 2026 Bayesian network meta-analysis of 56 RCTs (1,488 patients) on moderate-to-severe atrophic acne scars concluded combination therapies generally beat single treatments; fractional CO2 laser plus subcision or PRP was most consistent, and microneedling plus PRP ranked among the best for significant-improvement rate (Ou et al., Aesthetic Plast Surg). [4]
In a 2014 JAMA Dermatology randomized split-face trial (Alam et al.; 20 enrolled, 15 completed), three needling-roller sessions 2 weeks apart significantly improved acne scar scores at 6 months; participants rated a 41% mean improvement on the treated side, mean pain was 1.08 of 10, and no adverse events were reported (2010 data). [1]
A 2026 meta-analysis (Agu-Jefferson et al., Cureus; 11 studies, 713 participants) found no significant difference between microneedling and chemical peels in achieving clinically significant (≥50%) acne-scar improvement (RR 0.97), though microneedling was more likely to give any improvement (RR 1.79). [2]
A 2024 network meta-analysis of 24 randomized trials (1,546 participants) found microneedling combined with chemical peels gave the best acne-scar improvement and satisfaction, combinations beat microneedling alone, and side effects (redness, pain, hyperpigmentation) did not differ significantly between treatments (Li et al., Arch Dermatol Res). [3]
How do patients rate microneedling providers on Google?
Google reviews of med spas offering microneedling average 4.85 stars, across 4,714,457 reviews of 32,065 rated listings.
94% of the Google reviews left for microneedling providers are 5-star.
Star ratings in Google reviews of microneedling providers
Share of 4,714,457 reviews
Source: Google reviews, MedSpaStandard, October 2026
82% of microneedling providers with at least 5 reviews hold a 4.8-star rating or better.
3.4% of the Google reviews left for microneedling providers give 1 or 2 stars.
1.1% of microneedling providers with at least 5 reviews average under 4.0 stars.
Google lists results as a review theme for 14% of microneedling providers with review themes.
Google lists natural-looking results as a review theme for 8.0% of microneedling providers with review themes.
Find microneedling providers near you
Compare Google ratings, reviews and posted prices at med spas in your city.
What published research says
These numbers come from outside sources, not our directory; each one links to its source below.
- The American Academy of Dermatology says acne is the most common skin condition in the US, affecting up to 50 million Americans each year — a figure it sources to the AAD/SID "Burden of Skin Diseases" study of 2004 data (published 2006). [5]
- Among 1,972 acne patients seen by 120 US dermatologists in one week, 43% (843) had acne scarring, and 69% of those with scars had only mild or moderate acne at the visit (Tan, Kang, Leyden; J Drugs Dermatol 2017). [6]
What these numbers can't tell you
- Counts are Google Maps listings we classify as med spas, so they include dermatology and plastic surgery practices that offer med spa treatments and exclude spas without a Google listing.
- A treatment counts when the spa's Google listing or website names it, so a spa with an outdated menu can be over- or under-counted.
- Ratings and review themes are Google's, as shown on each listing on the snapshot date; Google filters some reviews and does not publish how.
Frequently asked questions
What is the success rate of microneedling?
A 2026 Bayesian network meta-analysis of 56 RCTs (1,488 patients) on moderate-to-severe atrophic acne scars concluded combination therapies generally beat single treatments; fractional CO2 laser plus subcision or PRP was most consistent, and microneedling plus PRP ranked among the best for significant-improvement rate (Ou et al., Aesthetic Plast Surg).
How do patients rate microneedling providers on Google?
Google reviews of med spas offering microneedling average 4.85 stars, across 4,714,457 reviews of 32,065 rated listings, according to MedSpaStandard directory data for October 2026. 94% of the Google reviews left for microneedling providers are 5-star.
Sources and methodology
Our data. October 2026 snapshot of 53,215 US med spa Google listings and their websites. How we build these numbers
- pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · National Library of Medicine
- pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · National Library of Medicine
- pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · National Library of Medicine
- pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · National Library of Medicine
- aad.org · American Academy of Dermatology
- pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · National Library of Medicine
MedSpaStandard. (2026, October 30). Microneedling Results Statistics 2026. https://medspastandard.com/statistics/microneedling/results/
Medical disclaimer. MedSpaStandard is for education only and is not medical advice. Talk to a licensed provider about your own health, and check any provider's license with your state board.